Thomas R. O'Donnell

Des Moines forum participants blast science standard changes; see a political motive

In STEM on January 30, 2025 at 2:55 pm

I sometimes thought that Iowa Department of Education staff members Stefanie Wager and Chris Like wanted to be anywhere else but Room B100 of Des Moines’  Grimes State Office Building on Thursday afternoon, January 23.

The Iowa science standards review forum’s rules, Like told a (eventually) standing-room-only audience, forbade him and Wager from answering questions. They were there to listen and take notes. (It appears that the forum, broadcast via Zoom, wasn’t recorded for review or transcription. That’s strange.)

So the pair sat in silence from 4 to 6 p.m. as speaker after speaker blasted the DOE and their bosses, director McKenzie Snow and Gov. Kim Reynolds. Each criticized changes someone at the department made to a draft of the revised standards submitted by a panel of 37 experts and stakeholders, including educators from Iowa universities and schools, plus parents.

No one, in person or on Zoom, defended the edits, which eliminated the word “evolution” (although “evolve” was intact in some cases) and changed “climate change” references to “climate trends.” There were other substantial changes that downplayed climate change and evolution, too.

It was the last of five forums held around the state, but you can still comment via a survey through February 3. (See this post for a suggestion on how to register your thoughts.)

Maybe the anonymous education department officials who were directed to or decided to cut politically charged terms from the document thought the changes would slip through unnoticed. But review panel members complained about the changes at an Iowa City forum last week. Reporters jumped on the conflict. And dozens of people responded by attending the Des Moines forum. They were philosophical, practical and sometimes angry.

Iowa Department of Education attempting to undermine science standards

In STEM on January 20, 2025 at 7:49 pm
Next Generation Science Standards logo

Shortly after I began this now-sleepy blog in 2013, I closely watched how Iowa debated the Next Generation Science Standards.

The NGSS represented a major change in how elementary and secondary students learn about the world. The standards focus less on rote learning and more on developing skills to evaluate evidence and reach conclusions – just as scientists do.

At first, I was skeptical about whether Iowa would adopt the standards without substantial changes – even though educators from the state helped develop them. I feared right-wing or religious voices would overrule sound science on issues such as the evidence that humans are causing climate change or that evolution is the best explanation for Earth’s biological diversity.

Some conservatives did attempt to influence the standards, and even urged state officials to reject them.

They failed. In 2015, the Iowa Department of Education adopted the standards with intact climate change and evolution references. Educators and the department held strong against critics who wanted to remove or rewrite those elements.

Now, 10 years later, it appears those detractors may get their way, at least partially – thanks to the Department of Education itself. Read on to learn how you can help block these alterations.

We sought candidates’ science policy views. One side mostly ignored us.

In Government, Uncategorized on November 1, 2022 at 7:24 am
The Iowa Science Policy Candidate Survey website header, featuring an Iowa map.

I’ve been involved with what began as the March for Science Iowa, now Science Iowa, almost since its inception. Launched as part of the national March for Science, its greatest achievement may have been drawing around 2,500 people to the Iowa Capitol on April 22, 2017. The Des Moines event was one of thousands around the world on Earth Day.

Another top achievement is the Iowa Science Policy Candidate Survey, an attempt to get every person seeking office in Iowa, from state legislature to U.S. Senate, on the record regarding science and science-related policy. Science Iowa has led this effort since the 2018 midterm election.

In 2020, Science Iowa’s survey received logistical support from Science Debate and the National Science Policy Network (NSPN), nonprofits that sought to foster similar efforts in other states. We joined with Iowa State University’s ASPIRE, an NSPN chapter, and the University of Iowa’s Connecting Science to Society, now an NSPN chapter, to devise the survey. Our coalition worked with multiple other Iowa science, environmental, education and agriculture organizations to compose the questions.

The 2022 midterm Iowa Science Policy Candidate Survey is having its best year yet. More, and more prominent, organizations signed on with input to our questions.

The Des Moines Register and multiple other Iowa newspapers, plus the Bleeding Heartland political blog, published opinion pieces promoting the survey. (Our attempts to appear on a conservative-leaning blog failed.)

Most importantly, we’ve received 24 candidate responses. The highlight: Both U.S. Senate candidates, Democrat Michael Franken and Republican Charles Grassley, weighed in.

Yet, that’s still only around 10 percent of the possible responses – and those we did receive revealed a worrisome phenomenon.

Urban Utopias

From Garden Cities to Smart Cities, the past and present of cities of the future.

Iowa Science Interface

A blog about research and STEM in the Hawkeye state

Miss Lou Acquiring Lore

Gallery of Life...

this is... The Neighborhood

the Story within the Story

Indie Omnibus

A blog about research and STEM in the Hawkeye state

Paul Krugman

A blog about research and STEM in the Hawkeye state

tsmith

A blog about research and STEM in the Hawkeye state

Deixis Online

A blog about research and STEM in the Hawkeye state